Fuji is very interesting to produce such a main shot to the X-PRO1 used that year, to see the coke section is reeling, 55-200 is not the focal point of the cheap section of the head, see aperture seems to have another mystery, not a 4-5.6 thin circle Pure sunshine head. Look at the price, I X! How are you so much more expensive than other homes? ! Fuji, are you in the pit? ! Fuji honey smile: pit can you squat?
Well, look at the Super ED glass and I'll have a play. If your honey smiles smirkingly, I'll spray you out.
Lens to the hand, 62mm caliber, good, and a lot of lens common filter. Including a long, long hood, as to why it is not lotus, it is not entangled, positioning, after all, is not a red XF lens, there is no 50-140 treatment. Get heavy in your hands. Workmanship is really good, there is no quandary in place in the assembly, try to screw the zoom ring, eh Soft ... touch soft rubber, good decent, and so on, this soft rubber material can withstand the accrual it? If you're deformed and peeled, it's not fun, 23333. Turning the zoom ring, the moderately damped feel is delicate, and the single-lens inner tube protrudes. The entire lens is now straight and I think the straight-type hood is indeed more harmonious than the lotus shape.
Suspicious ~! How does the focus ring feel cold, is it metal? Sure enough, it is to open the gap with the XC lens, ah, fine-grain metal knurled focus ring damping is very comfortable, although it is electronic simulation MF focus, but the moderate sense of damping is not rich electronic taste, this point to give praise, I also Do not Tucao a law player's new top shot that no sense of damping the focus ring, after all, is also a kind of understanding of design ideas, 2333.
Aperture ring is still a rigid plastic, with 1/3 as a file, and the sense of “beep†is very clear when turning, which facilitates blind operation. This gives a good comment. The lens mount is metal, which is necessary for the XF lens.
After speaking about the appearance and work experience, it is the actual operation.
This lens is equipped with an LM linear motor. Compared to the previous 23 1.4 DC motor, the LM motor's instantaneous behavior is very agile, and the more obvious difference is the quietness. It is a big difference. Compared to the DC motor, the LM linear motor It is so important that this is so important that it completely enhances the use experience.
As for the floating aperture of this lens F3.5-F4.8, I was small and selfish and roughly equivalent to F4, with more efficient OIS image stabilization, with this lens, my body AUTO ISO is generally set For ISO200-6400, the safety shutter bottom line is 1/80s, this configuration and setting are not stressful during the daytime and near evening operation.
Speaking of practice, not to mention the resolution, especially the telephoto lens feeling to avoid the resolution that is rogue. Let's open it directly!
The resolution of this lens is very high. Even with the full aperture at the farthest end, the resolution is fully adequate, and the 1600W pixel seems to feed its optical resolution design. Because even if I receive a stop, I can't see how much gain the resolution has in the center of the picture. I am looking forward to the performance of this lens on the X-Pro2, X-T2 2400W pixel body.
As for dispersion, it is also the place where this lens makes me more satisfied. The suppression of dispersion is in place. Sometimes I even try to make it difficult for me. The XF55-200 can still cope with it calmly. Here I will directly put on the film to explain its resolution and suppress the dispersion level.
Do you think this lens is really good? Ha ha I'm not a soft handwriting gun, how can we not mention the weakness of this lens? That is bokeh! Come and come, let's see the film to speak, is not the two linear more obvious, when faced with detailed and complicated background, some powerless? This is right, after all, a price of goods (the smile of Fuji honeybush appearing in the brain), if the XF55-200's bokeh can also be layered, then what about the XF50-140? , No, the flag of Mao Rui zoom head can only give 50-140 anti-! Fuji is really well-intentioned! (Ah, obviously it is a profiteer who wants your money with good intentions)
Since this lens with OIS optical image stabilization, then I do not do nonsense anti-shake test is not attentive, then I will pull it back, go out and go!
Well, the anti-shake performance is still good, be regarded as the mainstream level, maybe I Kirin arm, iron hand skill is not solid (no way, get married, the children are more than two years old), do not know there are 55-200 users can reach What level. For me, this 3-4 file's anti-shake effect is fully enough.
The last is summary! The price of the goods before the price increase is quite high, the price of about 3K, excellent resolution, practical aperture, effective anti-shake, good workmanship and materials. But now the price is quite high. Many users will focus on the XC50-230, which is much lighter and cheaper. Although the aperture is smaller than the previous one, the difference in image quality is very small.
The last thing is to lose the map package, shoot bad, parrot bird is shot behind the reflective glass. Everyone excuse me. the above!
If you still like my original words, you can pay attention to me, and click on my previous article below, there is no anti-cabs in the next, only a short time ago from the SLR transfer position to nothing. Learning is in the process of learning, we all learn together and encourage each other!